![digi 003 reaper digi 003 reaper](https://images.reverb.com/image/upload/s--ws0QBtQy--/t_card-square/v1633894229/bwmnafkunby6upqezpbe.jpg)
My recordings also sounded very good and I have a couple of friends who where on Digi 002 systems who always commented on the quality I was getting.Ī couple of years ago, some other guys I know started a commercial recording facility on their Pro Tools platform, and offered for me to do some engineering/freefreelancing at the studio. My system was rock solid and I never had any problems. When I started recording on a DAW, I built a PC and used Cubase SX 2 and an Echo Layla 24/96. My personal experience has been the opposite. but protools being the software i've used the past 10 years and enjoying the software and the capatibility issues with other studios. I know i could get something "as good" in a non-protools system for cheaper. So the 001 is going to be around for awhile longer still. hahaha, yeah, still can't afford that and will I ever?. But, it would make your studio compatible with projects from most other studios and most of the home recordists out there in the world.įound myself looking around at used HD-1 prices yesterday. Subatomic pieces wrote:It wouldn't necessarily sound better than what you have.
DIGI 003 REAPER DRIVERS
They don't want to even have to think about drivers and software and compatibility and all of that stuff. Hard as it is for people around here to believe, some people just want to get busy recording. It's very easy to get things going with an all-in-one solution. Digidesign, for all the shit that they take, has provided a way for someone to bring home a box, plug it in, and start working.
![digi 003 reaper digi 003 reaper](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/f9/37/6e/f9376e08fb93a6567b2c29332ddb9dd0--sound-effects-grains.jpg)
Some people just don't want to fuck with having to do the research to get a non-Digi rig up and running. So, why would some home recordist shell out the extra dough for a PT setup? Maybe they want an easy solution that doesn't require a lot of computer expertise to get it up and running. But, I believe that compatibility is what makes it the de facto standard in commercial studios. If you like what you're using, and have no need for compatibility with other peoples' sessions, then there's no need to switch to PT. But, it would make your studio compatible with projects from most other studios and most of the home recordists out there in the world.Īs far as sound quality goes, whether you're talking about the 003 or the Echo box, you're still dealing with something that's maybe a small step above entry level gear. It wouldn't necessarily sound better than what you have.